Showing posts with label nursing home employees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nursing home employees. Show all posts

Friday, March 8, 2013

Looking Out For A Loved One In A Nursing Home


A news article by USNews.com recently directed family members how to look out for an elderly relative in a nursing home.  According to the 2/26/2013 article, there are many ways to assure that your loved one is being properly cared for at their nursing home.
First of all, make sure that you check in with your relative and ask them firsthand how they feeling about their nursing home.  Asking questions, like how comfortable and safe they fell, are good starting points for getting the real feel of the facility. Other important questions to ask are how long it takes for a call button to get answered and if they have formed positive relationships with any staff or other residents.  Also asking questions about what a typical day looks like  may be helpful in determining potential problems within the facility.

Additionally, look around the facility and be alert for unusual sounds and smells.  Do the residents and their clothing also appear clean and taken care of?  Also, listen carefully.  Do you hear silence, laughter, or music? Or do you hear silence or clanking, rattling pipes?   As small as these observations might seem, they may be important for gauging the atmosphere and mood of the facility.
You should be able to check in with the nursing home any time you would like, but is courteous to ask the staff when the best time during the day to call might be.  Many nursing homes often have quarterly conferences to give you and your elderly family member times to catch up with staff and address potential questions/concerns.  Also dropping by the facility unannounced may give you a clear picture of a normal day.

Also be conscious of the fact that the nursing home staff needs several things from you as well.  They need a phone number where they can reach you promptly and efficiently.  They also need you to be respectful of them and their time, since they have very busy and demanding jobs. 
Attorney Doug Stoehr is a personal injury lawyer who  takes nursing home abuse and neglect cases in the western and central Pennsylvania areas.  He takes cases in Blair and the seven surrounding counties, and his practice is based in Altoona, PA.  For more information on his firm, please call his office at 814-946-4100 or visit his website at http://www.stoehrlaw.com 

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Be Careful What You Sign

Many people do not read what they sign when they are admitting their loved ones into nursing homes. It is very important to read what you're signing so that you do not sign away important rights, such as the right to sue a negligent nursing home.  NBC News covered this phenomenon in a recent article written by Michelle Andrews on 9/18/2012.  The article may be viewed by reading below or clicking this link.
When Paul Ormond signed John Mitchell into a nursing home in Dennis, Mass., in June, he was handed a few dozen pages of admission papers. Ormond, Mitchell's legal guardian and an old friend, signed wherever the director of admissions told him to.
He didn't realize that one of those documents was an agreement that required Mitchell and his family to take disputes to a professional arbitrator rather than to court.
Mitchell had been institutionalized since suffering a stroke in 1999. During a hospital stay early this summer, Mitchell, then 69, had received a tracheotomy and needed to switch to a nursing home that could accommodate him.
A few weeks after Mitchell arrived at the new nursing home, staff members dropped him while using a lift device to move him from his bed to his chair. Later that night Ormond, 63, got a call from the nursing home that Mitchell was unresponsive. Mitchell was rushed to the hospital, and doctors found that the fall had caused extensive bleeding on his brain. He died a few days later.
Mitchell's sons hired a lawyer to look into the circumstances surrounding their father's death. That was when Ormond learned that amid all the admissions papers he had signed was an arbitration agreement.
"I thought it was deceptive, and I was pretty angry that I'd been tricked into signing something that I didn't know what it was," says Ormond.
A mandatory arbitration agreement is an often overlooked document in the package of admissions papers at many nursing homes these days. It can have an outsize impact if something goes wrong. But anxious seniors or their caregivers often sign every document that's put in front of them, perhaps only glancing at the content.
Signing an arbitration agreement means that in the event of a problem that is not amicably resolved -- Mom slips on a wet floor and breaks her hip, say, or Dad wanders off the premises and gets hit by a car -- you agree to bring the dispute before a professional arbitrator rather than file a lawsuit for negligence or wrongful death, for example.
Agreeing to arbitrate is generally not in families' best interests, say consumer advocates. For one thing, it can be pricey. In addition to hiring a lawyer, the patient or family generally has to pay its share of the arbitrator's fee, which may come to hundreds of dollars an hour, says Paul Bland, a senior attorney at Public Justice, a public interest law firm based in Washington.
"In court, you don't have to pay the judge," he says. "Our taxes pay for that."
Court proceedings are also conducted in a public courtroom and leave a detailed public record that can inform industry practice and help develop case law, say experts. Not so with arbitration hearings, which are conducted in private and whose proceedings and materials are often protected by confidentiality rules.
The amount awarded -- if any -- may also be less if an arbitrator hears the case than it would be if a case went to trial, say experts.
Aon Global Risk Consulting analyzed 1,449 closed claims involving long-term-care providers between 2003 and 2011 and found that there was no money awarded in 30 percent of claims where a valid arbitration agreement was in place, compared with 19 percent of claims in which there was no arbitration agreement or the agreement was determined to be unenforceable.
Likewise, nearly 12 percent of claims without arbitration agreements resulted in awards of $250,000 or more, compared with 8.5 percent of claims with arbitration agreements.
The study was conducted with the American Health Care Association, which represents 11,000 long-term-care facilities. According to the report, "loss rates" -- reflecting the dollar value of liability claims paid -- are increasing 4 percent annually.
"Liability costs for providing care have grown and escalated" in recent years, says Greg Crist, a spokesman for the association. Arbitration agreements help keep a lid on those costs, he says.
That may explain why arbitration agreements have become much more common in nursing homes, experts say. The agreements are increasingly used in assisted living facilities as well.
Arbitration can also benefit patients and their families, Crist says. Claims are typically resolved more quickly than court cases, he says, so attorney costs are lower and patients can retain a larger portion of any financial settlement.
The Federal Arbitration Act, enacted in 1925, allows for two sides in a dispute to agree to binding arbitration to resolve their differences. If a dispute arises and an arbitration agreement is in place, the arbitrators are jointly selected by the patient and the nursing home.
Although consumers usually don't realize it, there's a simple way to avoid being forced into arbitration, say experts: Don't sign the arbitration agreement.
What happens if you don't sign? Nothing, Crist says. "It's not a condition of admission to the facility," he says. The American Health Care Association doesn't support requiring people to sign an arbitration agreement as a condition of admission, he says, although practices may vary at individual nursing homes.
If you do sign and then wish you hadn't, arbitration agreements typically have a 30-day "opt-out" provision that allows you to change your mind and retain your rights to sue.
The judge in John Mitchell's wrongful death case threw out the agreement on the grounds that it was "unconscionable",  a legal term used to describe contracts that are unfair or unjust.
"The judge agreed it was too much to expect me to digest all of this information at once, and that the arbitration clause hadn't been explained thoroughly," says Ormond. A trial date hasn't yet been set.
Arguing that an agreement is unconscionable is one of the few ways people can extricate themselves from arbitration agreements once a dispute arises, says David Hoey, a North Reading, Mass., lawyer representing the Mitchell family. Another possibility is to prove that the person wasn't competent to sign an agreement or that the family member who signed wasn't legally qualified to do so.
Better yet, experts agree, is not to sign in the first place.

Attorney Doug Stoehr is a personal injury lawyer in Altoona, PA who specializes in nursing home abuse and neglect, as well as car accident claims.  For more information on his central Pennsylvania practice, please visit his website or call his law firm at 814-946-4100.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Criminal Records and Nursing Home Employees

Nursing home employment patterns have undergone a recent study, according to The New York Times.  Using recent data from a national stusdy, researchers found that up to 90% of nursing homes employ people that have been convicted of a crime.  Additionally, 5% of all nursing home employees have at least one criminal conviction. This data comes as a result of a study done by the inspector general at the Department of Health and Human Services.  They used data from more than 35,000 nursing home employees and cross-referencing the data from criminal records at the FBI.  The most common types of conviction were for crimes against property (burglary, drug-related offenses, vandalism, etc). However, some nursing home employees had been convicted of crimes like assault.
Although federal rules DO say that nursing homes cannot employ people who have been found guilty of elder abuse or neglect, but federal records do not always state if the victim was a nursing home resident.

According to the article in the NYT, "Our analysis of F.B.I. criminal history records revealed that 92 percent of nursing facilities employed at least one individual with at least one criminal conviction,” Mr. Levinson (the inspector general) said. “Nearly half of nursing facilities employed five or more individuals with at least one conviction. For example, a nursing facility with a total of 164 employees had 34 employees with at least one conviction each.”

Currently, there is no federal guideline explicitly requiring nursing homes to check federal and/or state criminal history records for job applicants. Only ten states require both a check of FBI and state records, and 33 require a check of state records.  The rest do not have any specific requirements at all.

Attorney Doug Stoehr is a central Pennsylvania lawyer specializing in nursing home abuse and negligence.  For more information on his practice, please visit our website.